INTRODUCTION:
Access to justice serves as a fundamental element of the India constitutional framework as provided under Article 14 and 21.[1] In this context, technology has emerged as a critical instrument for strengthening legal aid and pro bono services.[2] Digital platforms enable the State and legal institutions to overcome traditional limitations of cost, distance and manpower.[3] Initiatives such as Tele-Law and Nyaya Bandhu reflect a shift towards technology driven access to justice, where innovation serves to operationalise constitutional guarantees rather than a mere administrative reform.[4]
TELE-LAW: TECHNOLOGY- ENABLED LEGAL ADVICE AT THE GRASSROOTS
The Tele-Law scheme, Introduced by Department of Justice in 2017, represents one of the India’s most significant technology- driven legal aid initiatives.[5] Initially launched under the DISHA scheme, Tele-Law connect beneficiaries with panel lawyers through video conferencing, telephonic consultations and digital dashboards, primarily using Common Service Centres (“CSCs”) operating at the village and panchayat level.[6]
Operating within the framework of the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987, Tele-Law Focuses on providing pre litigation Legal advice to economically weaker sections, Schedule casts, Schedule tribes, women and other vulnerable groups. Beneficiaries may access this scheme either through CSCs with the assistance of trained Nyaya Sahayaks (paralegals) over or directly through Citizens Tele-Law mobile application.[7]
Tele-Law has substantially expanded the geographical reach of legal services. With over 2.5 lakh CSCs across more than 780 districts, the scheme enables individuals in remote and rural areas to obtain legal advice without entering the cost and logistical burden of travelling to courts or legal aid offices.[8] All consultations under the scheme are provided free of cost, reinforcing the constitutional principle that access to justice must not be determined by economic capacity.[9]
SCALE AND IMPACT: EVIDENCE FROM RECENT DATA
The scale of Tele-Law’s technological intervention is reflected in official cumulative data published by the Department of Justice.[10] According to the Tele-law statistics dashboard, the program has recorded consistent growth in registration and legal advice enabled across States and union territories. As of August 2025 a total of 1,13,20,978 cases have been registered under the Tele-Law programme, out of which 1,11,79,562 cases have received legal advice since the project’s inception in 2017-18.[11]
Source: Tele-Law Monthly Progress Report – August 2025
Monthly Progress Reports further indicate a notable shift in access patterns following the launch of Citizens Tele-Law mobile application.[12] In August 2025, all cases registered and advice enabled occurred through direct citizen registration via the mobile application, with no cases routed through CSCs.[13] Quarterly Progress Reports for October-December 2024 also reflect sustained adoption of digital legal aid mechanisms, highlighting increasing reliance on technology as a primary interface between citizens and legal institutions.[14]
Source: Tele Law Monthly Progress Report August 2025.
NYAYA BANDHU: INSTITUTIONALISING PRO BONO THROUGH TECHNOLOGY
While Tele-Law focuses on legal advice, effective access to justice also requires legal representation.[15] The Nyaya Bandhu programme, launched by Department of Justice, institutionalised pro bono legal services through a technology-based platform that connects eligible litigants with volunteer advocates.[16] Through its mobile application and online portal, advocates can register to provide pro bono services, while legal services authorities allocate cases based expertise, availability and jurisdiction.[17]
Official reports indicate a steady income in both registered advocates and beneficiaries under the Nyaya Bandhu platform.[18] By digitally structuring pro bono engagement, the programme enhances transparency, professional accountability, and efficient utilisation of legal expertise.
GENDER DISPARITIES IN DIGITAL LEGAL AID DELIVERY
Despite its achievement, Tele-Law has its own flaws, especially, in terms of gender representation.[19] Data from the Tele-Law Annual Report 2023-2024 shows a continuous gender imbalance among empanelled panel lawyers. Male panel lawyers constitute approximately 61%, while female panel lawyers account for only 39% of the total strength.[20] Although, female participation is gradually increasing, targeted measures to correct the situation are required.[21]
Source: Tele Law Annual Progress Report 2023–2024.
CHALLENGES IN TECHNOLOGY BASED LEGAL AID
Despite their potential, technology-driven legal aid faces many challenges. One of the primary issues is the lack of awareness. On field as a Pro Bono Associate, I often observed that many potential beneficiaries were unaware of the digital aid platforms, applications and services available through Common Service Centres (CSCs). Other major issues included poor internet connections, frequent call disconnections, and the lack of privacy at CSCs are major hindrances[22] Privacy is essential especially, in cases of domestic violence, matrimonial disputes, or sexual offences.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND POLICY DESIGN
As we look to the future, legal aid driven by technology can be enhanced through targeted policy measures. The harmonious integration of the e-courts and tele-law, legal aid clinics, ADR mechanisms can help provide a cohesive justice endurance from initial advice to resolution at the end.[23] In addition, artificial intelligence tools may also be important to solve legal inquiries, translate such information in easily understandable local languages, and enhance case management. It is equally essential to incorporate technology initiatives within wider justice reform strategies. Digital tools would not be able to replace human judgement, empathy, legal expertise, instead, they should serve solely as facilitators of institutional capacity.[24]
PRACTICAL REFLECTIONS
From a Pro Bono Associate’s perspective, the effectiveness of technology based legal aid depends ultimately on its execution rather design. Ground level engagement reveals that while much of the public now has access to mobile phones, awareness of CSCs and legal aid applications are limited. Therefore, regular awareness camps at the community level are important. Basic training on legal aid applications can be provided to school-going children and to parents during parent-teacher meetings or similar gatherings. Such low cost interventions can help significantly.
CONCLUSION
Technology has become an essential facilitator in enhancing access to justice. Digital legal aid programs like Tele Law and Nyaya Bandhu have improved the reach, efficiency, and inclusivity of the legal aid system, to an extent by handling the obstacles in terms of distance, cost, institutional capacity. By utilizing digital platforms, the state has successfully implemented its constitutional duty which guarantees equality before the law and meaningful access to legal remedies for marginalised groups.
However, structural issues with respect to digital literacy, infrastructure deficiencies, data protection, and professional capacity continue to hinder the complete realisation of technology based legal aid. Gender and regional inequalities further highlights the need for policy measures to ensure inclusivity and equality.
Moving further, technology should be regarded as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for human judgement and accountability. The present investment in digital infrastructure, legal education, professional development, and ethical governance will be important to ensure that technology driven legal aid is in harmony with constitutional principles.
[1] Constitution of India, arts 14, 21.
[2]United Nations Development Programme, Legal Aid Service Delivery: A Guide for Practitioners (2016).
[3]United Nations General Assembly, Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers (1990).
[4]United Nations General Assembly, Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers (1990).
[5]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law: Reaching the Unreached (Scheme Guidelines, 2017).
[6]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law: Reaching the Unreached (Scheme Guidelines, 2017).
[7]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law: Reaching the Unreached (Scheme Guidelines, 2017)..
[8]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Statistics Dashboard.
[9]Constitution of India, arts 14, 21.
[10]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Statistics Dashboard.
[11] Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Monthly Progress Report August 2025, para 3.8.5.
[12]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Monthly Progress Report August 2025.
[13]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Monthly Progress Report August 2025.
[14]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Quartely Progress Report October to December 2024.
[15] United Nations General Assembly, Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers (1990).
[16]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Nyaya Bandhu Pro Bono Legal Services Operational Guidelines.
[17]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Nyaya Bandhu Pro Bono Legal Services Operational Guidelines.
[18] Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Nyaya Bandhu Pro Bono Legal Services Report 2024-2025.
[19] Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Annual Progress Report 2023-2024.
[20] Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Annual Progress Report 2023-2024.
[21]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Annual Progress Report 2023-2024.
[22]Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, Tele Law Monthly Progress Report October 2024.
[23] Imtiyaz Ahmad v State of Uttar Pradesh, (2012) 2 SCC 688
[24] State of Maharasthra v Manubhai Pragaji Vashi, (1995) 5 SCC 730.
Thank you for sharing your feedback.
Our team will get back to you at the earliest
